Report: States should repair roads rather than build new ones

America is driving its transportation money straight into the ground. According to a new joint report published by Smart Growth America and Taxpayers for Common Sense, states are continuing a dangerous trend of focusing the majority of their transportation funding on the expansion of new roadways and too little on the maintenance and repair of existing streets.

Across the country, many states continue to give preference to new roads, while fixing potholes is secondary, despite the fact that potholes are  much more likely to drive up annual vehicle maintenance cost for drivers. According to the report, American motorists spend $67 billion annually on vehicle repair and operating costs as a result of driving on poor quality roads while road expansions have relatively marginal benefits.

That “poor” designation of American roads is only increasing. Between the report’s 2009 and 2011 timeframe, only 37 percent of American roadways were in “good” condition, down from 41 percent in 2008. This has resulted in an “enormous liability for state budgets and taxpayers.”

In order to bring the 21 percent of roads currently listed as  “poor” up to grade,  states would need to spend at least $45 billion annually over the next 20 years –which is three times what is currently spent on both expansion and repair combined.

While California fairs moderately well in the rankings of money spent on road expansion versus repair – 40 percent of all funds going to expansion, 60 percent to repair – it lags behind other more progressive states like Nebraska, North Dakota and New Jersey, all of which put upwards of 90 percent of transportation dollars toward the existing road network allowing them to save money down the road for other budget priorities.

Here in Stockton, the city’s Public Works Department has four major road widening projects in the pipeline: Hammer Lane between Alexandria Place and Thornton Road, going from four to six lanes across; One-and-a-half miles of Thornton Road expanding from two to six lanes; State Route 99 between Arch Road and the Crosstown Freeway, growing four to six lanes; and adding a new HOV and auxiliary lanes to Interstate 5.

The cost of these widening projects ranges from $10.2 million (Hammer Lane) to as much as $214 million (State Route 99) with some projects leveraging local Measure K funds which are derived from a half-cent sales tax throughout San Joaquin County. The report suggests an essential reprioritization of transportation dollars as a way to strategically invest in the existing road network. Local and state politicians need to prioritize maintenance of heavily used streets instead of throwing immediate support to any and all widening projects. Also, better cost-benefit analysis and asset management practices– both of which are heavily underutilized according to the report– would lead to more transparency and better planning for when, where and how much road maintenance would take place.

In addition to improving the quality of existing roads, implementing these recommendations provides a progressive solution for preserving the financial integrity of state budgets. While the upfront costs may seem large, over time the investments in road repair result in huge financial gains by minimizing the amount of maintenance that needed down the road. Costs rise as road conditions are allowed to continue to decline.

According to the report, “States continue to invest in road expansion despite the fact that roads remain in bad condition – and these spending decisions come with serious implications for state transportation budgets.”

Those implications include having to devote substantially more financial resources toward repairing roads once they reach that “poor” designation. For every dollar spent to keep a road in good condition, six to fourteen dollars are needed later to rebuilt deteriorating roads.

As the development dialog continues to shift toward the expansion of transit alternatives and ways to get people out of their cars, reeling back roadway expansion should be included in development conversation.  This priority shift presents an opportunity to invest more in the existing infrastructure we have available to us to improve the current transportation experience for all roadway users.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , ,

Categories: Transportation

5 Comments on “Report: States should repair roads rather than build new ones”

  1. Jon Seisa
    March 18, 2014 at 6:39 pm #

    Is there an explanation, rationale, or funding reason as to why most states prefer to build new roads rather than fixing existing roads? Just curious.

    • Kristine Williams
      March 19, 2014 at 9:48 am #

      Hi Jon,

      One of the explanations provided in the report is that it’s popular with the public – you can have a nice ceremony and it’s something new and tangible that leaders can tout. Also, the cost of up-front maintenance is higher than laying down new pavement even though you pay for it down the road (no pun intended).

      • Jon Seisa
        March 19, 2014 at 12:17 pm #

        Thanks so much Kristine, that certainly makes sense about the political feather in the elected officials’ caps. In Long Beach where I live in SoCal (I’m a Stocktonian native, Stockton was my childhood hometown, and since I’m a designer, I love keeping up on its development via SCL), I reside overlooking a major 4-lane urban thoroughfare that is heavily traveled, walked and biked, and is a trucking route to bring in goods to all the merchants, and finally after 30 years our street is getting entirely resurfaced and the curbs/sidewalks redone and upgraded. Believe it or not, parts of our current street still has concrete (instead of asphalt) from the 1950’s. That’s how long it has been; and meanwhile it has only been repaired like a patchwork quilt. I thought I would never see this day. But I know politics really had a lot to do with its neglect, because streets in the more opulent parts of town have been repaved over twice or even 3 times since I have lived here.

  2. April 11, 2014 at 2:33 pm #

    Road repairs in many areas in suburban and city areas need to be fixed before we invest in new roads. Repairing these roads is important for the citizens on that city and driving safely.

  3. July 28, 2014 at 11:27 am #

    If these roads were maintained more frequently, the cost wouldn’t be as high in my opinion. Regular maintenance tends to lower these issues and helps to keep drivers safe on the road! Thanks for sharing your post!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: